| |
| The fifth law of science. |
| The observation law of science |
| Science is based upon agreed observations. |
|
Example: Le Verrier observes rotating gravitational ellipses in an Euclidean space.
Someone else ,in a spacecraft having velocity v1 traveling away from earth, agrees on observing rotating gravitational ellipses.
The person in the spacecraft corrects the observations with the velocity, position and acceleration of the spacecraft to have the same observed data.
|
| |
| |
| |
| The statement: Rotating gravitational ellipses have been observed. (Le Verrier(1811-1877) Euclidean) is now also valid relativistic. That is not possible. The statement is valid in the first Euclidean system and the statement is valid in the second Euclidean system? So there is debate about the precise meaning of the observation. |
| An Euclidean system runs from minus infinity to plus infinity. But with relativity that is not the case, if you walk long enough you will end up in the second Euclidean system? |
| I am fighting the dream of the second Euclidean system. |
| |
| |
| |
| De uitspraak: Er zijn ronddraaiende gravitatie ellipsen waargenomen. (Le Verrier(1811-1877) Euclidisch) is nu ook geldig relativistisch. Dat kan niet. De waarneming is nu geldig in het eerste Euclidische systeem en de waardneming is nu geldig in het tweede Euclidische systeem. Er is dus discussie over de precieze betekenis van de waarneming. |
| Een Euclidisch systeem loopt van min oneindig naar plus oneindig. Maar met de relativiteit is dat niet zo , als je maar lang genoeg loopt komt je in het tweede Euclidische systeem? |
| Ik vecht tegen de droom van het tweede Euclidische systeem. |
| |
|
| Some pictures out of my reasoning |
 |
|
| stefanboersen@hotmail.com |